Web Survey Bibliography
With increasing frequency JavaScript is used in web studies,often with a certain naivity regarding compatibility issues.These technical problems might result in methodological artefacts with some types of online research,and ethical questions have to be considered as well.However,for reasons of design and applicability of a number of techniques,Web experiments should generally be less prone to possible biases,and between-subjects Web experiments even more so than within-subjects Web experiments (Reips,1999,in press). Consequently,we tested whether a JavaScript version of the Web experiment would result in more or less problems than a traditional CGI version.Therefore we conducted an experiment on a meanwhile well-known phenomenon:the hindsight bias.The hindsight bias is the tendency of people to falsely believe that they would have predicted the outcome of an event correctly,once the outcome is known.Mazursky and Ofir (1990)demonstrated that highly surprising outcomes could eliminate or even reverse the hindsight bias:Participants showed a ”I could not have expected this to happen ”reaction instead of a ”I knew it all along ”reaction. Stahlberg,Sczesny and Schwarz (1999)found a reversed hindsight bias when participants learned about a self-threatening outcome.Stahlberg et al.hypothesized that motivational factors like self-protection would play a role in moderating the hindsight bias.To test whether the surprise or the threat of the outcome leads to a reversal of the hindsight bias we conducted a Web experiment where we experimentally manipulated both factors.In a 2 by 2 factorial design (with the factors highly and not surprising outcome vs.highly and not self-threatening outcome)we expected a strong reversed hindsight bias when the outcome was highly surprising and highly self-threatening.The comparison of the condition highly surprising but not self-threatening outcome with the condition not surprising but highly self-threatening outcome should show which of the two factors surprise or threat will reverse the hindsight bias.Results will be discussed.
Web survey bibliography (4086)
- Web and Mail Survey: Comparison on a Large-Scale Project; 2000; Kennedy, J. M., Kuh, G. D., Li, J., Hayek, J., Inghram, J., Bannister, N., Segar, K.
- Method and Representation in Internet-Based Survey Tools: Mobility, Community, and Cultural Identity...; 2000; Witte, J. C., Amoroso, L. M., Howard, P. E. N.
- Developing Usability Guidelines for AudioCasi Respondents with Limited Literacy Skills; 2000; J., Schneider, S. J.
- Technology Effects: Do CAPI or PAPI Interviews Take Longer?; 2000; Fuchs, M., Couper, M. P., Hansen, S. E.
- What Users Want From a Tool for Analyzing and Documenting Electronic Questionnaires: The User Requirements...; 2000; Kelly, M.
- Documentation for 2000 Presidential Election Internet Survey; 2000; Alvarez, M. R., Sherman, R.
- Internet Panel Response To The 'State Of The Union' Address: An Experiment; 2000; Frankovic, K. A.
- Current Practices in Intraspinal Therapy - A Survey of Clinical Trends and Decision Making; 2000; Hassenbusch, S. J., Portenoy, R. K.
- Online qualitative research task force: report of findings; 2000; Sweet, C., Walkowski, J.
- International growth of Web survey activity; 2000; MacElroy, B.
- Using online focus groups for e-commerce research; 2000; Johnson, W.
- The future of online research; 2000; James, D.
- Taking It To The Web; 2000; Grant, A. T., Dispensa, G.
- An opposing view of online surveying; 2000; Gorman, J. W.
- You've got surveys; 2000; Lipke, D. J.
- Developing usable Web sites - a review and model; 2000; Cunliffe, D. V.
- Impact of measurement periods on website rankings and traffic estimation: a user-centric approach; 2000; Lee, Su., Leckenby, J. D.
- The power of online research; 2000; Taylor, H.
- Report from Portland. AAPOR conference focuses on Web research; 2000; Totten, J. W.
- Psychological Experiments on the Internet; 2000; Birnbaum, M. H.
- A Brief History of Web Experimenting; 2000; Musch, J., Reips, U.-D.
- Potential of the Internet for Personality Research; 2000; Buchanan, T.
- Using the Internet for survey research: A case study; 2000
- Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation; 2000; Groves, R. M., Singer, E., Corning, A.
- E-interviewers add human touch to Web-based research; 2000; Wygant, S., Feld, K. G.
- Variables influencing dropout rates in Web-based surveys; 2000; MacElroy, B.
- Research non-stop; 2000; Grecco, C.
- Measuring response rates in online surveys; 2000; MacElroy, B.
- Content Analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and Challenges; 2000; Weare, C., -Y., Lin, W.-Y.
- Banner-advertised Web surveys; 2000; Tuten, T. L., Bosnjak, M., Bandilla, W.
- Use of E-Mail And Internet Surveys By Research Companies; 2000; Totten, J. W.
- A Comparison Of Mail, Fax, And Web-Based Survey Methods; 2000; Cobanoglu, C., Warde, B., Moreo, P. J.
- Introduction: Survey and Statistical Computing in the New Millennium; 2000; Banks, R.
- Making Web research pay off: A research manager roundup; 1999; Smith, P.
- Back to the Future of Online Polling; 1999; Taylor, H., Terhanian, G., Mitofsky, W. J.
- Nonresponse in Web Surveys; 1999; Vehovar, V.
- Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity; 1999; Nielsen, J.
- The Design of an International Real Time Data Collection System: SADC-HYCOS; 1999; Andrews, A. J., Pieyns, S., Servat, E.
- Survey research; 1999; Krosnick, J. A.
- Factors affecting measurement stability. More is not necessarily better: Effects of number of items...; 1999; Thomas, R. K.
- Calibration as a standard method for treatment of nonresponse; 1999; Lundstrom, S., Sarndal, C.-E.
- Question Appraisal System - QAS-99 ; 1999; Willis, G. B., Lessler, J. T.
- Current Internet science - trends, techniques, results. ; 1999; Reips, U.-D., Batinic, B., Bandilla, W., Bosnjak, M., Graef, L., Moser, K., Werner, A.
- Internet Systems for Evaluation Research; 1999; Watt, J. H.
- 'Once would be enough': some reflections on the issue of safety for lone researchers ; 1999; Kenyon, E., Hawker, S.
- The Effect of Incentives on Response Rates in Interviewer-Mediated Surveys; 1999; Singer, E., van Hoewyk, J., Gebler, N., Raghunathan, T., McGonagle, K.
- Measuring the Flow Construct in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach; 1999; Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., Yung, Y.-F.
- Internet Survey Data Collection: The Case Of Webqual; 1999; Deans, K. R., Adam, S.
- Drop-out caused by JavaScript: "I could not have expected this to happen " - A Web experiment...; 1999; Reips, U.-D., Schwarz, S.
- Can Internet Polling Work? Strategies for Conducting Public Opinion Surveys Online; 1999; Flemming, G., Sonner, M.